{"id":1422,"date":"2009-12-06T02:56:31","date_gmt":"2009-12-06T09:56:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/?p=1422"},"modified":"2025-06-14T21:14:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-15T01:14:25","slug":"scancafe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/2009\/12\/scancafe\/","title":{"rendered":"Scanning 4,419 family photos"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In August, I shipped off a box of negatives from our family photo collection to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scancafe.com\/\">ScanCafe<\/a>, a photo scanning service. I was a little nervous shipping irreplaceable memories to people I didn&#8217;t know, but a couple of my colleagues had successfully used the service and I really wanted to get the photos digitized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For those of you unfamiliar with the service, here&#8217;s the basic process:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Place an order with ScanCafe.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ship box of photos to ScanCafe.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ScanCafe scans your photos and ships the originals and files back to you.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>There are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=scancafe+review\">plenty of reviews<\/a> of the service already (mostly positive), and here I&#8217;ll talk about my experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ordering and Packing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Estimating the number of negatives is tough. We had many envelopes stuffed with negatives from many rolls, so I couldn&#8217;t just multiply a number by 24 or other standard number of exposures. Fortunately, you don&#8217;t really need an exact count at all; you&#8217;re just supposed to enter in some number so that ScanCafe can provide an estimated cost, which you pay 50% of before shipping. I estimated about 3,000 photos and ScanCafe ended up scanning 4,400.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because I was nervous about putting everything in one box which was eventually going to be shipped internationally, I randomly divided our photos in half and only sent one half in with the first order. With everything packed, I printed off the shipping label. The label had a weight mentioned on it (I guess determined by the number of photos), so I hoped that the package wasn&#8217;t too heavy, and fortunately UPS didn&#8217;t complain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Scanning\/Timeline<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ScanCafe does a pretty good job of giving updates on the status of the order, which I <a href=\"http:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/2008\/11\/communication-fail\/\">expect and appreciate<\/a>. You don&#8217;t get to see the scans come in live or anything, but you know when your package has arrived in at the facility, when scanning has started, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the status updates collected in my email archives, here&#8217;s the timeline of events for scanning 4,400 photos:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>August 10th &#8211; ScanCafe received package in Burlingame, CA.<br>\nAugust 24th &#8211; Originals received at imaging center. Images expected to be available for review by September 19th.<br>\nAugust 31st &#8211; Scanning commences.<br>\nSeptember 22nd &#8211; Scans available for review.<br>\nSeptember&nbsp;27th &#8211; Order completed.<br>\nOctober 13th &#8211; Received tracking number.<br>\nOctober 20th &#8211; Originals and DVDs delivered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Image Review and Checkout<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Until this point, everything with ScanCafe was as good as I expected it to be based on the reviews, except for it taking a little longer than I thought it would. To be fair, though, they did scan thousands of photos, and I&#8217;d much rather wait longer than see a compromise in quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One of the nice things about ScanCafe is that you can actually choose to not buy up to half of your scans (you&#8217;ll still get the originals back), so they let you preview them all online before placing your order. I wonder if anyone takes advantage of this feature, because the site is excruciatingly slow when loading images. Even loading thumbnails and album lists felt like being on dialup. I&#8217;m guessing that the servers are located in India, so it would be nice if they moved to U.S. hosting. The &#8220;express checkout&#8221; option looked very tempting from the start.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The lack of speed wasn&#8217;t what bothered me the most. The site is confusing at this point. There is an option to organize the photos, but I&#8217;m not really sure what I&#8217;m supposed to do. I&#8217;m also not sure about the free restoration that&#8217;s offered. I didn&#8217;t see it as an option, and wondered if it would be something that I chose after selecting which photos I wanted. I had no idea if this process was applied to my photos, as some images definitely looked unrestored in the gallery. Maybe it happens automatically after you choose your photos?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even though it&#8217;s not required to organize your photos before you send them in, they will name the folders based on an labels or containers, which is helpful. I had a few labeled APS cartridges, but everything else was loose, so most of my folder names are things like &#8220;Bag 10.&#8221; They do label the physical bags\/boxes if you didn&#8217;t. One funny thing I noticed is that whoever wrote my folder names wasn&#8217;t very familiar with the English language. For example,&nbsp;<em>Christmas <\/em>was written as&nbsp;<em>Charstmas,&nbsp;Chartmas,&nbsp;Charestmas, and&nbsp;Chnstmer.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Delivery<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After checkout, things didn&#8217;t move as quickly as I thought they would. It took two weeks before I received a tracking number for the return package. I guess they batch up the shipments between India and the U.S., which could explain the delay. The photos arrived in good condition along with the DVDs in full-size DVD cases. The 4,400 photos came in the form of over 50 GB of JPEGs spread across 13 DVDs. I&#8217;m in the process of uploading them all to Picasa Web Albums, which fortunately just <a href=\"http:\/\/googlephotos.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/twice-storage-for-quarter-of-price.html\">lowered its storage costs<\/a>! It would be great if there was a way to directly transfer them from ScanCafe to PWA, though. That&#8217;s my feature request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Unresolved confusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the final receipt, there was a line for the optional &#8220;pro resolution&#8221; service that I selected during the initial order. However, I&#8217;m not sure how to interpret this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted\">Actual  Deleted  Selected\n4419    0        2962<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<p>I was charged for the &#8220;Selected&#8221; amount. Does this mean that some of my scans weren&#8217;t delivered at pro resolution? I sent an email to ScanCafe asking about this on November 27th, which was forwarded to the imaging center on December 1st, when I was promised an answer within 48 hours. I have not heard back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Update on December 6th: ScanCafe wrote back and said that this is a glitch in the displayed image count. All of my photos were scanned a pro resolution. Phew.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Update on December 7th: They emailed me again to inform me that the bug has been fixed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Overall impression<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I obviously had some issues with the website, but overall I&#8217;m happy with the convenience of the service and the quality of the scans. A second order is on its way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>One more thing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It snowed today in Pennsylvania. I wasn&#8217;t there to experience it, but thanks to ScanCafe, I can still show you what I look like in a snowsuit:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/wysz.com\/p\/gus.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"400\" height=\"612\" src=\"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/gus-1.jpg\" alt=\"Michael Wyszomierski in a snowsuit holding a shovel\" class=\"wp-image-1424\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/gus-1.jpg 400w, https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/gus-1-196x300.jpg 196w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In August, I shipped off a box of negatives from our family photo collection to ScanCafe, a photo scanning service. I was a little nervous shipping irreplaceable memories to people I didn&#8217;t know, but a couple of my colleagues had successfully used the service and I really wanted to get the photos digitized. For those &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/2009\/12\/scancafe\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Scanning 4,419 family photos<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-geek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1422"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1422\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3441,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1422\/revisions\/3441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysz.com\/wyszdom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}