Wyszdom

March 30, 2013

Free parking in the sharing economy

Filed under: Geek — By @ 8:07 pm

Parking at SFO’s long-term lot costs $18 per day. For a weeklong trip, that’s $126. And from where I live, round-trip cab fare can be even higher. A common technique is to park at the nearby BART station for only $2 per day, but then you’re subject to the train schedule, which adds a bit of complexity and you need to carry your luggage through a train station in addition to an airport. I recently tried another option.

FlightCar is a way to get free airport parking. You simply let FlightCar know when you’ll be traveling, drop off your car with them, and pick it up from them with no fee when you return. In exchange for you not having to pay for parking, FlightCar may rent out your car while you’re gone. Whether your car is rented or not, you don’t have to pay for parking. And yes, they take care of insurance, cleaning your car, etc.

Here’s how my experience was:
I listed my car ahead of time. It was a very easy signup process and only required some basic information about my car. As per their instructions, on the day of departure I called them when I was about 15 minutes away from the airport. I had an early flight, so this happened to be at 4:12 AM. I was told to drive to the Millbrae BART station, which an earlier email had indicated would be the likely meeting point. The person on the phone was very helpful, giving me exact directions to the station and letting me know how to identify who I was supposed to meet. At the station, I met one of their valets, who walked around the car with me, noting any existing scratches, and having me sign the paperwork. This only took a couple of minutes. We both got back in the car, and I drove him to the terminal, where I got out and handed over the key. And that was it until I returned.

A week later, after retrieving my bag, I called FlightCar to let them know that I was back. I told them that I was on the arrivals level and which door number I was standing outside of. They also asked me what color jacket I was wearing, and then told me to wait for a black Town Car. Less than 10 minutes later, a black car picked me up and took me to a parking lot in Millbrae. Until this point, everything had gone smoothly and as promised. When we arrived at the parking lot, it was dark and raining, and just a bit eery sitting in a black car facing my own car waiting at the other end of the lot. The lot wasn’t lit, and there was no signage identifying it as a business. An attendant with a flashlight approached the car, and took me over to mine with a flashlight. He mentioned something about a generator being off, which is why it was so dark. He had me sign another piece of paper, said that he didn’t think the car had been rented out, and turned on the car to check the mileage. At this point the radio turned on at a high volume, with the station set to hip hop, and the mileage was higher than I had remembered. The gas level was about the same. To his credit, the attendant reacted quickly, turning off the radio, and noting that the odometer was reading about 500 miles higher than it was when I had dropped off the car. He then called his boss to find out what had happened. He quickly learned that my car had in fact been rented out, and let me know that I would be receiving a check in the mail for $70. I entered my address on his phone and was on my way. One additional issue that I noticed later was that my insurance card was missing from the glove compartment. I think they remove it and replace it with a FlightCar card during the rental, but they must have forgotten to put it back. This wasn’t a huge deal though as I was able to print a new one.

A few days later, as promised I received a check signed by the CEO and cofounder. And then about a week later, I received a reply to an email I had sent to FlightCar containing my feedback. The CTO and cofounder explained what they had done to address it. They’ve made sure that they always have gas for the generator, so the lot should never be dark, and they’ve added signage to make it clear that it’s the FlightCar lot. He also gave some background on the confusion about my car being rented. They used to send the driver an email if their car was rented, but due to abuse of the system by car owners seeking free parking without renting out their cars, they’ve stopped sending those emails, at least for now. As for my missing insurance card, he was going to make sure the valet on duty understands the correct procedure. As I’ve mentioned before, one of the great things about trying a startup is that while there are often kinks, they tend to be very responsive to feedback as early customers help them with feedback.

Overall, I found the service to be convenient, and it’s pretty hard to beat the price of -$70. I’ll admit that I was pretty thrown by learning at the last minute that my car had been rented out, and for the first few minutes of driving back to my apartment, I thought that I wouldn’t use the service again—not because they had failed me in some way, but because I was a little weirded out by the fact that someone else had been using my car, and I had no idea how carefully they had driven it. I was also a little annoyed by the inconvenience of having to take all of the items out of my car before dropping it off and then replacing them later. As some time has passed, though, I’m more inclined to try it again. Someone renting a car is most likely not going to do anything crazy with it, as they’d risk getting a traffic ticket or damaging the car, and having to deal with all of the consequences of that. It’s not really a big deal for me to carry a few personal items in and out of my car. And, it is pretty silly to pay so much for parking.

When I mentioned this service to Dan, he handed me his copy of The Economist, which had a cover article on the sharing economy. The article points out an exciting trend that’s going on where people are able to make some money by sharing what they have, without all of the overhead of advertising, insurance, billing, and other administrative costs that would have made the process too expensive or complicated in the past, and renters are able to get access to products and services that they may not have been able to afford in the past. There are plenty of examples. RelayRides and Getaround let you rent out your car or rent someone else’s. I’m looking forward to finding an excuse to rent a Model S someday. For those who don’t want to rent out or rent a car, Lyft, SideCar, and Tickengo facilitate the sharing of rides. Now I understand what all of those pink mustaches were about that I saw in San Francisco on Tuesday. :) LendingClub facilitates loans to and from its members, and I know someone who has made very good returns from the service. TaskRabbit is used by people who need help with small jobs, and those who are seeking to help. Wal-Mart is apparently considering paying in-store customers to provide same-day delivery service to online customers. (By the way, Google is testing same-day delivery in the San Francisco Bay Area, so sign up if you’d like to try it for free during testing.) Beyond sharing of relatively everyday items, there are even more premium services like BlackJet which allows those who are well-off, but not quite so well off that they can afford to purchase or charter a jet, to purchase an individual seat on a private jet flight. Or, as an example of something on the more affordable side, Fancy Hands provides personal assistant services to those who need some extra help, but don’t need to hire a full-time assistant.

I love innovation. These services are opening up opportunities to customers, property owners, and service providers that they may not have had otherwise, expanding the market. I understand that innovation can mean uncomfortable disruption, but incumbents should play to their strengths rather than protecting their business (and not consumers) via regulators. For example, I’m inclined to avoid taxis because of their unpredictability. While I’ve had plenty of perfectly fine experiences as a rider, I’ve also had drivers who drive aggressively, don’t know where they are going, talk loudly on the phone the entire time, refuse to take me to my destination, generally seem annoyed or even angry that I would get into their car, and of course insist on cash payment. I don’t have to worry about that with Uber, plus Uber provides the added benefit of a nicer vehicle. So why don’t taxi services learn from their competitors and play to their strengths? They have a large fleet of cars. Their drivers, in general, have a good knowledge of the areas they serve. To make me happy, all they’d need to do is get reliable mobile apps, provide a reputation/rating system for their drivers (and perhaps for passengers as well, if they’d like), have a GPS unit (or any smartphone) on standby, and accept credit card fees as part of the cost of doing business. It doesn’t have to be the 5% fee that one cab driver’s sign recently claimed.

One interesting point that’s made in the article (watch the video for more context) is that while I may have felt a little weird about the FlightCar experience on my first try, my trust for this kind of service may increase over time, just as people don’t even blink before giving their credit card number to an online store today. We’re partially through this initial trust issue with cloud computing, where users are starting to understand that professionals who run data centers are probably better at protection and reliability than a local solution. Or, as one of my favorite analogies goes, I feel safer keeping my money in a bank than under my mattress.

For a look into the future of how an economy of part-time labor could work, check out this TEDTalk by Wingham Rowan.

March 24, 2013

Time lapse

Filed under: Geek — By @ 6:52 pm

One of my goals this year was to shoot more time lapses. I started the year off right by shooting one using the built-in timelapse feature on my Android phone:

On a recent trip, I upgraded to using my DSLR for a few shoots. Here are two of them:

They’re in 4K (which YouTube supports – woo-hoo!), so if your system is up for it, enjoy the videos in greater than HD resolution.

The workflow that I used was:

  1. Shoot in interval timer mode (I used an interval of 10 seconds so the memory cards could keep up, but next time I’ll take it down to 8) with a D800E, recording in “overflow” mode so that the camera fills up the primary memory card first, and then moves on to the secondary slot. Save images as RAW.
  2. Import photos into Lightroom, and make adjustments to color temperature, etc.
  3. Export photos as TIFF if you’re like me and don’t like to compress stuff until the end.
  4. Import TIFF files into Final Cut Pro, and drag into the timeline.
  5. Set the project to 4K/3840×2160/30p.
  6. In the Inspector, choose Fill under Spatial Conform to crop the stills so they fill the 16:9 video frame.
  7. With all of the clips selected, right-click on one and select “duration” (or type ^D) and then type the number “1” and then hit the “Enter” key for a duration of one frame per clip.
  8. Export a master file. I’m weird and encode using ProRes since I like to provide YouTube or wherever with the highest-quality file I can, but MPEG-4 is probably fine and uploads faster. If you want to go really crazy, YouTube will even take uncompressed video, but be prepared for a really long upload time.

I want to make some changes to that workflow, though. I originally tried shooting while tethered to my Mac. There are a few reasons why:

  • Recording to memory cards means I’m limited by their memory capacity.
  • To maximize memory, I shoot in overflow mode instead of backup mode. As luck would have it, during one shoot my CompactFlash card got corrupted and I had to recover it using Disk Drill.
  • The interval timer feature on the D800 is limited to 999 shots. At 30 frames per second, that’s only 33 seconds of footage.

Unfortunately, the D800’s interval timer feature is not compatible with the tethered capture mode in Lightroom, and Lightroom doesn’t offer any interval timer feature on its own. I tried a free piece of software called Sofortbild, which seemed to have exactly the features that I wanted. However, in my tests it would shoot for about five minutes, and then stop transferring the image from the camera to the computer. I did buy a Trigger Happy remote on Kickstarter, but I didn’t bring it with me on the trip, so I’m not sure if that works while the camera is tethered. I would have tested that functionality before publishing this, but while attempting to test it I found that my 10-pin remote socket is now misaligned and I cannot connect any accessories until it’s repaired by Nikon. I hope they don’t charge me anything since it’s under warranty and apparently a somewhat common issue.

I have also while writing this discovered that Final Cut Pro can actually handle RAW files (wow!), so I might skip Lightroom completely in the future, assuming I don’t need its editing functions. This is really cool to know and will save me some space if I don’t have to do a TIFF export.

Something I’d like to do next is to stretch time in each frame. I can use long exposures to help smooth out the motion by blurring anything that moves, as if the motion is happening in real time. For example, in the second video, longer exposures would have made the person on the deck less jumpy, and the same goes for the trees in the foreground of the third video. I have some “black glass” which allows for daytime long exposures, so I hope to shoot a timelapse using that.

In addition to these technical changes, I want to improve the content of my timelapses. In this case, I simply pointed the camera at some good-looking mountains, but didn’t really take a ton of time to compose the shots. I’m also aware that shooting a timelapse of clouds is like shooting a macro of dew drops on a flower. It’s been done. Maybe that’s okay, but I’ll try to find other things to shoot.

December 24, 2012

Merry Christmas

Filed under: Christmas — By @ 9:25 pm

macro of lit red candles platter of Christmas cookies with a gingerbread house macro of candles in colored glass Charlie Brown Christmas tree in front of a fireplace bayberry candle burning in front of a fireplace

December 15, 2012

Try a startup!

Filed under: Geek — By @ 9:55 pm

I love giving startups a try. They’re often rough around the edges, but the customer service is almost always better than an average more established company. Not to say that big companies can’t have great customer service.

Tonight’s example: I sent an email to Pathjoy customer support. I received a reply with a resolution from the CEO in 16 minutes on a Saturday night. It’s hard to beat that.

December 2, 2012

Thanksgiving

Filed under: Miscellaneous — By @ 11:06 am

Zucchini bread with cranberry sauce in the background

Cheese platter

Cornbread

Stuffed mushroom, bacon-wrapped scallop, and prosciutto-wrapped fig on a plate with black olives, in front of a martini glass

Drink with a cinnamon stick

Snowman holding a bowl of M&Ms

More

November 13, 2012

Car vs. Chromebook

Filed under: Geek — By @ 9:59 pm

One night last December, I walked out to my car carrying some recently cleaned clothes and a Chromebook. I set my Chromebook on top of my car while I was hanging up the clothes. As I set the computer down, I thought to myself, “Wouldn’t it be funny if I drove away with the Chromebook still on top of my car? That would be the Googler equivalent of leaving a coffee mug on a car roof.” I think you know where this is going.

I drove to dinner, and after I parked, I looked for my Chromebook to hide it away. I couldn’t find it. I knew what had happened. I actually never found the Chromebook that night, but a few days later I was notified that a coworker had found it and turned it in. The bottom had a bunch of scratches, but I didn’t see any cracks.

Bottom of a laptop with scratches.

And the top didn’t look bad at all:

Lid of closed black laptop

But when I opened it up, I saw this:

Broken LCD screen

Busted. For those who are curious, I’ve documented the entire recovery procedure below:

  1. Turn in broken Chromebook to the Chrome OS team. Mention something about a “durability test.”
  2. Receive new Chromebook.
  3. Sign in.

Total data loss: Zero.
Total pride loss: A bit.

Steps 1 and 2 are admittedly Googler-specific, but Chromebooks can be really inexpensive, so the financial loss is a lot less than it’d be with a different laptop. Overall, I’d say that if you can, avoid driving with your laptop on top of your car. There’s a good chance that it will get damaged. But if you do have to do it, use a Chromebook. Just don’t throw it in a river.

October 16, 2012

Testing Retinamatic

Filed under: Miscellaneous — By @ 12:08 am

Thanks to Retinamatic, the following photos should look crisp on a high-density display:

Moss hanging from tree

salt flat

Bear Creek Falls

October 15, 2012

I don’t wait in line at the airport

Filed under: Miscellaneous — By @ 10:57 pm

I was asked tonight about how I skip lines in airports, so I figured it’d be worth publishing a blog post about it. As a bit of background, I’m a frequent flier, and I don’t like to wait in line. I’ve been known to pass on free food because there was a queue. I hardly ever go through tolls or into San Francisco, but I have a FastTrak tag and a Clipper card. I ordered a passport card just because I thought it looked cool. I’m a little weird.

I skip lines via multiple programs. Here are my impressions of Clear, TSA Pre, and the Global Entry program. Keep in mind that this is just from a sample size of a single experience for each service, and they’re still relatively new.

Clear

The experience
I recently used this at SFO’s international terminal. At the time, the regular line was not very long, but they only had one lane open and it wasn’t moving quickly. I was traveling with a group, so I wasn’t planning on taking advantage of Clear for this trip, but when we realized that we were risking not having enough time to grab breakfast before boarding, I popped over to the Clear lane. The procedure was really easy at this point. There was nobody else in line, so I just handed over my card to the friendly agent, who scanned my boarding pass, card, and fingerprint, and then escorted me past the TSA agent who was checking IDs, putting me right at the front of the line for the rest of the usual TSA screening process. The Clear process took less than a minute. I still had to take off my shoes, take my laptops out of my bag, take my jacket off, and choose between the body scan or pat-down. But, I was able to get through the entire checkpoint in just a handful of minutes and spent my time waiting in line for breakfast while my friends waited in the TSA line, allowing us to eat before boarding the plane, which was promptly delayed.

Disadvantages vs. TSA PreCheck

  • Costs money
  • Doesn’t get you out of any of the inconvenient procedures.

Advantages over TSA PreCheck

  • Easy enrollment. No frequent flyer status or extensive application required.

How to get it
Sign up online, pay money ($179/year without any discounts; the link I just dropped has my referral code and gets you 1 free month), then visit an enrollment center (at the airport) to get your picture and fingerprints taken. They’ll then mail you your card, so you can’t use the service right away, but the entire enrollment process is pretty painless.

TSA Pre

The experience
This was confusing as a first-timer. I thought that there would be an indication on my boarding pass if I was eligible for the PreCheck lane, but there was none. It appears that one don’t know if they’re eligible for that lane until the boarding pass is scanned. Fortunately, there was no line to get the boarding pass scanned. Once the agent scanned my boarding pass and checked my ID, I was waved on to a magical experience compared to what most TSA checks have become. I didn’t have to take off my shoes. I didn’t have to take off my jacket. I didn’t have to take my laptops or liquids out of my bag. Actually, I’m not sure if the not taking liquids out had anything to do with it; I always forget to take my liquids out, and they almost never pull my bag.

All I had to do was drop my bags on the belt, and then walk through a metal detector. That was it. It was so fast and comfortable, and better than any current screening process that I’ve been through recently in the world (includes the UK, Ireland, Germany, and India). There was no backlog of people waiting for the invasive body scanner which requires each passenger to stand still in for several seconds, and then wait several more seconds for a result. I didn’t take up my usual huge amount of space on the conveyor belt with three bins and two bags.

Disadvantage vs. Clear

  • Enrollment requires flying a lot or filling out an extensive application.

Advantages over Clear

  • Free(ish)
  • No body scan or patdown
  • Keep your shoes on
  • Keep your jacket on
  • Keep your laptop in the bag

How to get it
There are a couple of ways. The “free” way is to become a frequent flyer on a participating airline (I’m in it via US Airways) and they’ll give you an option to opt-in to the program. It doesn’t cost anything. When you fly on that airline, they’ll automatically send the right data to the TSA. The other way, which doesn’t limit you to a particular airline or require status, is to enroll in a Trusted Traveler program, which gives you a number that you can enter in that “Known traveler” field that you may have seen and wondered about during the booking process. This route is a bit more of a burden and costs money, but I’ve found it to be worth it as a member of the Global Entry program, which I’ll describe below.

Global Entry

This program lets you skip the immigration line when entering the United States. If you’ve traveled abroad before you know that coming back into the US can mean waiting in line for an hour, and this program reduces the process to just about a minute. What you do is simply get off the plane, and head towards one of the automated Global Entry kiosks. The kiosks are located by the crew lines, so just follow a pilot or flight attendant. You don’t even need to fill out a landing card, and I’ve never seen a line at the kiosks. There, you scan your passport and fingerprints, and answer a few questions on a touchscreen, essentially answering the questions on the landing card (anything to declare?) without having to enter in your passport number, etc. The machine provides a printout, and you then walk right past the border patrol officers stamping passports (you bypass them completely) and straight to the customs officer who takes the piece of paper and waves you in. So you miss out on getting a re-entry stamp, but it’s a nice, fast process, and only takes a couple of minutes. When I was sick on my way back from India and couldn’t have possibly waited in line for more than 20 minutes without having to abort, I found signing up for this program to be the smartest decision I made about that trip.

How to get it
Go to http://www.globalentry.gov/. Meet the eligibility requirements, fill out a pretty long background check (where you’ve lived, etc.), and pay $100. After your application is approved, you need to schedule an “interview,” (don’t worry, it’s not an interrogation) and then go to an enrollment center in person to be fingerprinted and photographed. It’s honestly a bit of a cumbersome process, but sometimes after a long international flight all you want to do is get home as fast as possible. It was definitely worth it for me. If you can get a few friends together at your office, you may be able to have the enrollment officers visit your workplace so you don’t have to travel for the in-person enrollment steps.

Thoughts

As an individual traveler, I liked being able to have a briefer, less intrusive, and less cumbersome screening process. For me, the pre-work was worth it for a smoother travel experience. Some people may not feel comfortable with the fingerprint and iris imaging, but as a geek I actually enjoyed the novelty factor. The funny thing is that the privatized, more expensive Clear service appears to have the least value-add, but until all airports get TSA PreCheck, I’ll probably remain a member if my travel schedule continues at its current rate of activity.

I’m not fully convinced this is all necessary for security, but I’m not an expert so I’ll try not to be an armchair security guru. I do see how both Clear and the Global Entry program do a better job of verifying identity, since they use biometrics. The difference in screening processes for TSA PreCheck vs. the regular process is something I’m still not able to completely justify, but if I can find my way into the less intrusive process, I’ll take it.

Now who wants a blog post about how I get free upgrades on 50% of my domestic flights? (It’s on US Airways, so don’t get too jealous.)

September 21, 2012

Endeavour Flyover

Filed under: California,Geek — By @ 11:06 pm

Today, the Space Shuttle Endeavour flew over the NASA Ames Research Center while piggybacking on NASA’s Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, and I got to see it! Here are a few photos that I took:

April 30, 2012

What it’s like IMing with any girl ever

Filed under: Quote — By @ 5:34 pm

5:02:32
Girl: Hi!

5:02:33
Me: Hi! What’s up?

5:24:41
Girl is offline.

Next Page »

©2013 Michael Wyszomierski